Fill in a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Template

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it's important to keep several key points in mind to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here are some essential takeaways:

• Complete Administrative Data: Ensure that all personal information in Part I, such as name, SSN, rank, and unit details, is filled out correctly. This data is crucial for identification and record-keeping.
• Understand the Rater's Role: The rater is responsible for evaluating the rated NCO's performance. This includes providing specific comments and assessments in various categories, so clarity and honesty are vital.
• Review Counseling Dates: Document all counseling dates accurately. This reflects the ongoing support and guidance provided to the rated NCO throughout the evaluation period.
• Performance Evaluation Matters: In Part IV, focus on the rated NCO's performance in areas such as character, presence, and leadership. Use specific examples to illustrate strengths and areas for improvement.
• Senior Rater's Input: The senior rater plays a critical role in assessing the rated NCO’s overall potential. Their evaluation should consider the NCO's performance compared to peers, providing a broader perspective.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO’s signature does not indicate agreement with the assessment but confirms that they have reviewed the report and understand the contents.
• Know the Appeals Process: Be aware of the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. This knowledge empowers the rated NCO to address any concerns regarding their evaluation.

By adhering to these guidelines, individuals can ensure that the DA 2166-9-1 form is filled out accurately and effectively, supporting the professional development of NCOs within the Army.

Filling out the DA Form 2166-9-1 can be straightforward, but mistakes often occur. One common error is failing to include the correct name of the rated NCO. The name should be entered as it appears in official records, including the last name, first name, and middle initial. Omitting or misspelling any part of the name can lead to confusion and delays in processing the evaluation.

Another frequent mistake is providing an incorrect Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID number. This information is critical for identification purposes. Double-checking the number against official documents can prevent issues down the line. Additionally, forgetting to include the unit or organization information can hinder the evaluation process, as it is essential for proper routing and record-keeping.

Many people overlook the reason for submission and fail to specify the period covered by the evaluation. This information is vital for context and helps ensure that the evaluation aligns with the appropriate reporting period. Inaccuracies in these sections can lead to misunderstandings regarding the performance being assessed.

Another area where mistakes occur is in the email addresses provided for the rater and senior rater. These must be official military email addresses ending in .gov or .mil. Using personal email addresses can create complications in communication and verification.

Some individuals also neglect to sign the form or provide a date on the signature line. This oversight can render the evaluation invalid. Each rater and senior rater must sign and date their respective sections to confirm their agreement with the evaluation.

In the performance evaluation section, failing to include specific comments can weaken the evaluation. Comments should be clear and provide context for the ratings given. Simply checking boxes without elaboration does not give a full picture of the rated NCO's performance.

Additionally, when filling out the APFT section, individuals sometimes forget to provide necessary comments for failed assessments or profiles. This information is crucial for understanding the rated NCO's physical readiness and adherence to Army standards.

Another common error involves the overall potential assessment. Selectors must carefully consider how the rated NCO compares to peers. Providing a vague or overly broad assessment can misrepresent the NCO's capabilities and potential for future assignments.

Finally, individuals may overlook the requirement to list two successive assignments and one broadening assignment. This information is essential for understanding the rated NCO's career trajectory and readiness for future roles.

By avoiding these common mistakes, individuals can ensure that the DA Form 2166-9-1 is completed accurately and effectively. Attention to detail in each section will lead to a more comprehensive evaluation and a smoother review process.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, it often accompanies other important forms and documents that help in the overall assessment and documentation process. Understanding these additional forms can provide a clearer picture of the evaluation landscape.

• DA Form 4856: This form is used for counseling sessions between a rater and a rated NCO. It documents the discussion of performance expectations, goals, and areas for improvement, ensuring that both parties are aligned on objectives.
• DA Form 67-9: The DA Form 67-9 is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). While primarily for officers, it serves as a comparative tool for assessing leadership qualities and potential, offering insights into how NCOs interact with officers.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It provides a snapshot of the physical readiness of the NCO, which is a critical component of overall performance evaluation.
• Power of Attorney for a Child: When considering the welfare of your child in various circumstances, consult our comprehensive resources for Power of Attorney for a Child to facilitate informed decision-making.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used to record body fat content measurements. They are vital for ensuring that NCOs meet the Army's height and weight standards, contributing to their overall evaluation.
• DA Form 201: The Individual Medical Readiness (IMR) form tracks the medical readiness of soldiers. It is crucial for ensuring that NCOs are fit for duty and can perform their responsibilities effectively.
• AR 623-3: This Army Regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the evaluation process. It serves as a comprehensive guide to understanding how evaluations should be conducted and what standards must be met.

These forms and documents play a significant role in the evaluation process for NCOs. They ensure that all aspects of a soldier's performance, from physical fitness to leadership capabilities, are taken into account. Familiarity with these forms can enhance the evaluation experience, making it more thorough and effective.